Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mega Force

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The policy based arguments are in favor of deletion Guerillero | My Talk 06:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mega Force[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 11:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable: one of the article's two independent cites[1] pretty well says as much.TheLongTone (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Even some of Kenner's most popular lines lasted only three years, so the fact this one lasted a year is not really relevant. For a nearly 25 year old subject (pre-web), there is not going to be a huge amount of web RS refs, but there are a few. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:MUSTBESOURCES is not a compelling argument to keep an article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I didn't say there weren't any RS refs. What I said is that there is not a HUGE number, but there are some. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.