Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MegaCityHipHop.Com Compilation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MegaCityHipHop.Com Compilation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet any of the criteria at WP:NALBUMS [[User talk: Pulisi|Pulisi]] ([[User talk:Pulisi|talk]]) (talk) 08:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. [[User talk: Pulisi|Pulisi]] ([[User talk:Pulisi|talk]]) (talk) 08:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about the compilation album. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia's notability criteria for albums have evolved significantly since this was first created in 2010 — once upon a time, the only notability criterion that a compilation album had to pass was that it had at least one notable artist with a Wikipedia article on it, which this obviously does. But that's no longer the baseline standard: to be notable now, an album has to show a lot more than just the presence of a blue link in the track listing, such as significant critical attention, chart performance, notable awards, or something of that ilk. The only thing here that starts this down the correct road is the (deadlinked but likely recoverable) review from Exclaim! — conversely, neither "RapReviews.com" nor "Urbnet.com" bolster the case, since those are both blogs rather than real reliable source media outlets — but while Exclaim! is a start, it isn't a finish all by itself if it's the only acceptable source on offer, and I can't find anything else that helps. Bearcat (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.