Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeno Peluce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. consensus is the sourcing is enough, when coupled with the roles to meet the bar. Star Mississippi 01:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meeno Peluce[edit]

Meeno Peluce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Non-notable former child actor who never had any significant roles. His half-sister is notable, but notability is not inherited. Originally prodded but the prod was removed by a brand new account with no other edits. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 21:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Netherlands, and California. Shellwood (talk) 21:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He didn't have a very long career, but it was a very prolific and written about one. He was a regular on four different television shows albeit none that had long runs, three with articles, Voyagers! being the one he seemingly is best remembered for and his roles in Don't Go Near the Park (a truly horrible movie though) and The Amityville Horror seem significant enough too. He also got a lot news coverage over his career (not common for child actors normally), especially during the run of Voyager! so he easily meets the GNG as well. A sampling of those. Related to Voyager! 1, 2, 3, 4. Related to his other work 5, 6, 7, 8. Where are they now type coverage 9, 10. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Per sources identified above, WP:NACTOR #1, and the WP:GNG. Per WP:PROD: PROD must only be used if no opposition to the deletion is expected, this article should NEVER have been prodded. There is not even the beginning of a case for deletion, so not expecting opposition to deletion would be really steep. Kudos to SellerLake for detecting the problem and to GoldenAgeFan1 for finding excellent sources. gidonb (talk) 15:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Seems to only have had bit parts. The article doesn't have much beyond a simple timeline of what they did. Oaktree b (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Umm. Did you look at any of the pages of movies and shows he appeared in or the multitude of sources cited above that greatly detail his life and career up to that point? He was the co-lead along with Jon-Erik Hexum on Voyagers! and he was a regular on three other TV shows (The Bad News Bears, Best of the West and Detective in the House). He played a significant part in Don't Go Near the Park and had a large enough part in The Amityville Horror. An unknown, bit part actor wouldn't have been written about so many times in such detail. Would you consider checking out those sources cited above and see if that changes your vote? The state of the article doesn't necessarily indicate the notability of the subject. (WP:ARTN, WP:NEXIST) GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Biographies are timelines of things that people did and a bit beyond. It's exactly what it is supposed to be in a biography. Delete opinions disregarding the roles and sources of subjects should be read as WP:IDONTLIKEIT. gidonb (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.