Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meen (2015 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meen (2015 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon. The cast of this isn't even announced. Article creator Kreativekkonnect is blocked as a socking editor making lots of promotional edits. See also Hari Bhaskaran Rathinam. Drmies (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary delete per being TOO SOON. Enough sources are available so that it be reasonable that it canj be spoken of in the article of director Hari Bhaskaran Rathinam as one of his planned projects, but since it has not begun filming it fails WP:NFF. Allow a return once filming is confirmed. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above and this being one of a series of articles created by editors/socks with conflict of interest, who also apparently run some movie and music PR websites; see ANI report and SPI report. Note that while The Hindu and Indian Express articles may appear notable on first sight, those are published in local supplements of the two newspapers, which as has been discussed at WP:RSN previously are not high-quality sources as they often publish lightly edited press-releases (as is clearly the case here, given the overlap in language of the two articles). Abecedare (talk) 16:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.