Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediaeval Combat Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mediaeval Combat Society[edit]

Mediaeval Combat Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:ADVOCACY page on an unremarkable group of about 70 members. Does not meet WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is hyper-local, WP:SPIP, and / or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Subject does not meet general notability requirements and is only mentioned in local media outlets. Meatsgains(talk) 01:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 07:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 07:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for lack of notability. Kudos to the enthusiasts, thumbs down for the article. Possibly promotional text. -The Gnome (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete shame to say this since this is probably a major group for the area of Mediaeval Combat reenactment, and it' a worthwhile endeavor. Unfortunately very few if any local/regional clubs will ever have valid Wikipedia articles because of the strict guidelines on notability. This one is no exception, there simply isn't anywhere close to the level of secondary sourcing needed to support an article. Prince of Thieves (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - sadly, as notability not established. Dreamspy (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.