Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media curation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Media curation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem like an especially notable topic. It's had maintenance tags related to notability and sourcing on it since 2010 without any major improvement. Reads more like an essay than an article. clpo13_(talk) 02:06, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and possibly wp:NUKEANDPAVE at that. A badly written orphan article after three and a half years, incredibly badly referenced, and seemingly non notable. Neonchameleon (talk) 11:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - so badly written it needs blowing up. Bearian (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Other articles cover this topic and nothing here is worth saving with a merge. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.