Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaSleuth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MediaSleuth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A website for educational media. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:GNG. Truthsort (talk) 23:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as web content that fails to make a subminimal claim of importance: an e-commerce extension of the National Information Center for Educational Media.... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The organisation in Smerdis's quote has an article here on WP - with a prod tag on it and just as badly referenced as this one. I get the feeling that some people put articles up and then never come back to see how they're doing - or else they're arrogant enough to think they are above the requirements of referencing. This organisation may be notable (though I doubt it) but there's no evidence given. Peridon (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.