Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaGlobal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MediaGlobal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:CORP. Not to be confused with several firms of the same name. Kleuske (talk) 01:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Aside from the launch press release, other links seem to have gone dead. I see one indication that the agency closed in 2015 [1]. This leaves the question whether it attained notability during its 2006-15 span? In 2012 the agency received a Silver Medal in the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation/UNCA Global Prize [2] but that feels a bit primary: a UN award for an agency based at its own Secretariat. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the article does not provide any evidence that the company is notable, and it does not appear to be from my searches for sources. — Bilorv_(talk)^(c)(e) 00:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.