Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Me n Mah Beat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 13:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Me n Mah Beat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: It appears that this article, along with KJIVA, his apparent "magazine" Lifoti, and "record label" United_Naxal_Records have NO reliable independent sources at all, not one. There is nothing but "free press release" articles, iTunes & Amazon store links, and user-generated music profiles. As to how these articles got approved: I don't know. But it looks like this user has been spamming Wikipedia with hoax articles. Not one reliable source exists for this musician, and in addition, none exists with a simple Google search either. See the following other three articles, as they are all up for deletion as well. Scorpion293 (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 18:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not a single reliable source. Part of a walled garden around KJIVA. Does not meet WP:GNG or any SNG. --Randykitty (talk) 18:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Currently unsourced by an RS. Searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:nmusic. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.