Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MeTwo movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. General Consensus. (non-admin closure) Yoyowhatsup2 (talk) 02:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MeTwo movement[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a movement but a hashtag; I'm not sure it's relevant enough to justify a redirect (probably to Mesut Özil). power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Keep in mind that the sources for this may not be in English but German. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
keep it is clearly relevant. Keep in mind that this is not the English Wikipedia but Wikipedia in English. This movement is very heavily debated in German mass media over a long period of time. Which is what is defined as notable in the guidelines. Not to mention that it has been debated in Austria and Switzerland too. And it has even been debated in British mass media.--APS ^talk 21:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Two reasonably substantial articles from The Washington Post and Chicago Tribune would seem to contribute to notability. There are other sources as well, such as a slightly longer analysis at the Gatestone Institute, though I believe that it is considered a less than reliable source. This should fall under the WP:NNEWS guideline, which means that it may not meet the requirements if there is no WP:LASTING significance—on the other hand, this has been covered internationally, which is a point in its favor with WP:GEOSCOPE. Since this is a recent event, we are unable to evaluate whether it will receive persistent coverage. I think it is appropriate to keep this article at least until a clear evaluation can be made per WP:RAPID. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.