Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McMahonism (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

McMahonism[edit]

Previously nominated a few months ago resulting to no consensus. This article is fancruft and over-emphasising a WWE storyline that really isn't that notable for Wikipedia and lasted only a good few weeks before the McMahon/Michaels feud evolved away from religion. Oakster ^(Talk) 17:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete CRUFT. -->So sayeth M e t h n o r^{Sayeth back}|_{Other sayethings}
Delete Very minor storyline. Darren Jowalsen 19:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Storyline's over, no notability otherwise, Cruft indeed. SirFozzie 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete still say it's religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 19:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vince McMahon. VegaDark 20:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to Vince McMahon MrMurph101 21:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. RobJ1981 23:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like we'll get consensus this time. YechielMan 02:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as annoying pointless storyline. (Can we delete the part of Vince's brain that thinks this stuff is good TV, too?) Tony Fox (arf!) 03:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Gawd, I wish... --Roninbk _{t c #} 08:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fancruft. Adamkik 08:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete cruft. –– Lid^(Talk) 08:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Summarize and merge somewhere else. I can understand the NC vote while the storyline was current. Now that it's run its course, it probably deserves a mention on a history page at the most. --Roninbk _{t c #} 08:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while wrestling storylines (Invasion) or gimmicks (Gobbledygooker) may be notable, individual parts of storylines, gimmicks, and other miscellaneous kayfabe (to which this is) are not. kelvSYC 19:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.