Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McFly family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of characters in the Back to the Future films. Stifle (talk) 08:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

McFly family[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filled with original research, the reference section is a quote farm and the contents of the article is essentially a duplication of information in List of characters Back to the Future films. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:12, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - backfill construction, original research, fancruft. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 23:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete - seriously fancruft and also violates the no original research policy and the verifiability policy. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Put this one in the DeLorean and send it over to Futurepedia where it would be welcome and where most of Wikipedia's BTTF fancruft articles have found a home as nice as Hill Valley itself. There is no real world notability for "The McFly Family" as a notable unit. Mandsford 02:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak redirect to List of characters in the Back to the Future films. I can change to a "keep" if someone can add some third-party sources to the article. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:44, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the list of characters. Transwiki then delete the content--the family tree is definitely OR, for instance. Jclemens (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for now to the list of characters to allow selective merge (e.g. of the family tree). Not enough (and relevant) content that couldn't fit in the character list. The article's name is a plausible redirect. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per sgeureka above. This is a plausible redirect. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect no sources that can WP:VERIFYNOTABILITY of McFly family. I am ok with a redirect if there is a consensus for it. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.