Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McCain Girls
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
McCain Girls[edit]
- McCain Girls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete nn group, per WP:NOT#NEWS, and WP:BLP1E. These girls may warrant a mention at McCain's article, but their limited WP:RS coverage is only in the context of a single story. Mayalld (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, good heavens no. JBsupreme (talk) 08:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable enough for it's own article. JamesBurns (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom and comments. Pyrrhus16 14:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found one source with a brief mention http://www.metroactive.com/metro/12.31.08/music-0853.html and another indicating it was a parody by 23/6 of campaign songs, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14girls.html?fta=y but does not appear notable. Jo7hs2 (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.