Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayur Shekhar Jha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mayur Shekhar Jha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Only substantial coverage I could find was this, but that's not enough for notability. Everything else was a primary source or just his authorship of articles in various news sources. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I do agree with the nominator, there are no substantial coverage to warrant an encyclopedic entry. I wonder why this article is not a WP:G11 candidate in it's current form. Hitro talk 18:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User Talk:HitroMilanese, I was going to put more and more info about the person (Mayur Shekhar Jha) in parts, there is a lot to talk about him. His political journey to rising against all odds, coming from one of the poorest regions of the world. But before all this, the moment I start a page, I am busy fighting here.Sumitkashyapjha (talk) 19:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I don't think it rises to the level of needing to be "fundamentally rewritten" as required by WP:G11. There's certainly puffery here, but there's also actual non-promotional information. I wouldn't object if another admin deleted it as per G11, but I don't think it quite hits the mark for speedy deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 18:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 18:45, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is not anything objectionable on this page. No information on the page is false. It's grossly unfair to put deletion notice on the page.Sumitkashyapjha (talk) 19:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have added couple of awards and felicitations to Mayur Shekhar Jha, links to verify both has been added. Removing deletion tag, please don't object to that. Thanks.Sumitkashyapjha (talk) 20:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:21, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a comprehensive failure of GNG. I was struggling to find information and even the ones I found were trivial [1]. The subject is a journalist but at this moment is not notable. The lack of secondary coverage is very obvious here. The awards mentioned do not have any secondary sources either, so it is unclear how important they are. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:47, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and in fact there is hardly any reliable sources to meet the criteria of verifiability. — Sanskari ^Hangout 16:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.