Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayr-Melnhof

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mayr-Melnhof[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This could be a CSD but for the fact that the article is 9 years old. I cannot see how it would satisfy WP:GNG if written now. Thoughts? Leaky Caldron 14:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)][reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and how it hasn't been deleted in 9 years is beyond me.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As per WP:LISTED, I believe the page has not been deleted till now. Though I believe more citations will be needed for the page. I have found some. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 17:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have update the page a little bit but could not do it completely so I have mentioned some of references in the talk page, please update the page accordingly. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The subject of this article is a 64-year old company that has been listed on a major stock exchange for 20 years. It has thousands of employees, and operations in more than a dozen countries extending over three continents. According to websites focusing on the industries in which it operates, such as this website and this website, it is a worldwide leader in its field. So the suggestion that the subject is not notable is absurd, and the fact that the article is not (presently) well written or referenced is irrelevant. Bahnfrend (talk) 16:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A listing on the New York Stock Exchange is enough to pass notability, so therefore there is no reason a listing on the Vienna Stock Exchange shouldn't be enough for notability either. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 01:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This book descrives them as a major European cartonboard company. -- Whpq (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.