Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayhem Brawler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify for potential reuse when the game is released or otherwise achieves notability. RL0919 (talk) 04:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mayhem Brawler[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a case of WP:NVIDEOGAMES with a smattering of WP:CRYSTALBALL. We should probably wait until the game's release to create an article on it. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 18:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 18:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 18:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added many details and sources from official sites. Can you check it again please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordZangar (talk • contribs) 10:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of reliable sources. CRYSTAL wouldn't be a problem if there was ample coverage of enough information to justify an article, even if the game is upcoming. However, there are just two reliable sources[1][2] and both cover the same announcement from November á la WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. LordZangar and McRunninFly appear to be COI editors. IceWelder [✉] 18:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A swathe of new sources was just added. Note that most of these are unreliable, only Igromania and Gamekult are not. However, these two (if not also all others) still cover the same announcement in RUNOFTHEMILL fashion. OP's CRYSTALBALL argument remains valid. The article may be recreated at a later point in time if it eventually becomes notable (either through previews, reviews, or other feature pieces). IceWelder [✉] 13:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@IceWelder: I would consider the WebTekno one as a RS too. Though that's based on experience I had on the Turkish Wikipedia. Maybe this article is a WP:TOOSOON, so draftifying can be an option. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 16:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but currently doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. There are a couple of reliable sources mentioned above. Might qualify for an article after its release. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 18:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - Lack of sufficient coverage to meet the relevant notability guidelines for this not yet released game means it should not remain in mainspace. However, sending the article to draft to await its' eventual release (and, presumably, greater coverage in reliable sources) seems a reasonable outcome in line with WP:ATD-I. --Jack Frost (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.