Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Gnyp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maya Gnyp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

News articles are about her movies, and make no mention of the producer herself. Other sources are just databases. Conifer (talk) 06:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 11:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Adequate third-party sources. Barely, but enough. Article would benefit from expansion. Montanabw ^(talk) 00:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 11:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: current sources are
1. IMDB (not RS)
2. "Screen Australia database". (not significant coverage - just lists her two films)
3. "Melbourne International Film Festival website". MIFF. (Coverage is one letter plus her name - " P Maya Gnyp")
4. Jake, Wilson (August 13, 2013). "Sydney Morning Herald". (does not mention her)
5. Matthieson, Craig (October 28, 2011). "The Age online". Fairfax. (does not mention her)
6. "Screen Daily". Screen Daily. Screen International. January 18, 2013. (List mention only "Maya Gnyp (GHOST Pictures – Australia)" - 1 of 74 listed)
None of these approach WP:GNG standards.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't meet WP:GNG guidelines. Rmosler | ● 05:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As Rich Farmbrough has explained that the subject hasn't received significant coverage.--Skr15081997 (talk) 02:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.