Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Ababadjani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maya Ababadjani[edit]

Only claim to notability seems to be a minor role in a film and she is not even mentioned in the cast. Also she fails WP:PORNBIO. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 22:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 23:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per nom. The sources don't look as though they're reliable, and I can't find any reliable sources elsewhere, although it is difficult locating sources for foreign-language performers. Epbr123 (talk) 23:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete fails both WP:PORNBIO and WP:N in general. If she has more than a minor role in mainstream cinema and/or wins somesort of award than things change but, for now she doesn't meet the criteria. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can't read Danish, but if the death threats and physical attack on this Arab porn actress by religious extremists are really and truly sourced, it might establish notability. David in DC (talk) 13:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - Danish celeb. --THFFF (talk) 08:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I agree that it should be kept, but I doubt this is a good reason. What about Asian celebs? You don't see people using that as an excuse to keep an article, if the chance comes that they come up in an AfD. Lady Galaxy 22:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - combination of her two mainstream film appearances (one of which has an article on English wikipedia) and the publicity from the attack. I can't find anything through Google's translation service that counts as a reliable source though. Tabercil (talk) 12:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --NZQRC (talk) 17:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep one of the only arab pornstars very notable and non trivial. 71.245.211.91 (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC) — 71.245.211.91 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Weak keep. We have sufficent enough sources. We can find more.--Freewayguy ^{What's up?} 23:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The sources don't seem too substantial from what I can make out of the Danish. (Glad I didn't check those at work!) Zero gnews hits in English. I'll gladly change to keep if the death threats get documented.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per Tabercil. --Qwerty1234 (talk) 13:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Tabercil. Lady Galaxy 22:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.