Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxlite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ged UK 15:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maxlite[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maxlite is a stub article that is written almost entirely as an advertisement with very little sources and one source written by Maxlite. It has seen no edits (until today) since 2011 and is an orphan. The only edit that was not a revert since 2011 was by a person who claimed to "represent MaxLite" and redid the entire article like an advertisement. MaxLite, as currently written, shows 4 sources, two of which are dead links (one being a link to a non-functioning MaxLite-run site). By not having significant coverage by reliable sources, Maxlite fails to meed the standard set by the notability guideline. 155blue (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although there is a sprinkling of references in secondary sources (listing, e.g. Maxlite alongside other lighting manufacturers) the coverage is not broad and deep enough for this topic to reach the notability threshold. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 07:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NOMINATOR COMMENT As of 17:42:21 (GMT) on 30 July 2013, the article had two sources, both coming from a website of MaxLite. See here for the revision referred to. 155blue (talk) 17:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.