Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximus Isotonic Sports Drink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Frucor. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maximus Isotonic Sports Drink[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Propose redirecting to Frucor since the product appears non-notable. I had previously redirected it but the article creator recreated the page. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as fails GNG, it's more sandbox material than anything.→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Searches at Google News provided nothing so I thought I'd go to the Australian Google and search, but I also found nothing. Next, I searched national newspapers The Australian and Australian Financial Review but also found nothing. I also searched Coffs Coast Advocate, Sydney Morning Herald and Daily Telegraph. It's likely this product hasn't received much in-depth attention. The Wikipedia article for Frucor seems to have troubles as well but Google News does have news articles for Frucor and their website claims that they have won several awards. I'm going to try and improve the Frucor article as much as I can. I'm not fluent in Japanese but if it's Japanese-owned, there are probably sources in Japanese as well. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I want to mention that I have significantly improved the parent company's article. While this product (Maximus) is not notable, Frucor definitely is. SwisterTwister talk 23:53, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.