Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxim Apriatin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maxim Apriatin[edit]
- Maxim Apriatin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
self-promotion, no indication of importance Fauustru 16:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTABILTIY. Self-promotion indeed. Nine thousand views on YouTube are not a sign of notability. --Ezhuks (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete No assertion of real notability. Being a relative of someone notable is not sufficient. And if youtube is his claim to fame about then that doesn't bode well for the notability of his films either. Travelbird (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails to meet WP:BIO requirements. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 01:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.