Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Holmes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Max Holmes[edit]
- Max Holmes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Single-source article that links to his company website. No indication of notability. Bueller 007 (talk) 22:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTLINKEDIN. I see a few sources in which he supplies quotes and comments, but that alone is not sufficient to make him notable. Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 09:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can find various sources which mention the subject but these are in the context of activities by his firm. While these can demonstrate the notability of the firm, that does not carry forward into notability for the subject's biography. AllyD (talk) 05:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The news sources I can find say that Plainfield is run by Holmes, but as AllyD says they're mainly about the firm rather than him. Additionally, they run to the negative side ("...looking to relocate amid several redemption requests and a wave of lawsuits...") and I don't think they're of high enough quality for that level of negativity in a WP:BLP. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.