Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max (pig) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. The issue of merging can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Max (pig)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability questioned. Another editor tried to AFD but instead relisted the AFD from 2006 which closed as no consensus. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, although I wouldn't mind merge into George Clooney. Brandmeister t 23:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The topic is evidently notable, being covered in detail by numerous sources. Colonel Warden (talk) 18:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meteors are notable, but they don't have their own article, because they fit more logically into the subject of meteoroids. Macarion (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets the GNG because it is the subject of multiple independent and widely read sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Celebrity pets generally should be mentioned in their owner's article as they obviously are only notable for being the pet of a famous person. This could easily be moved wholesale to a new section in Clooney's article. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Beeblebrox. SpinningSpark 21:02, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.