Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maven Securities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. No mention target has been identified, but a redirect can be created at editorial discretion. Star Mississippi 15:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maven Securities[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no quality media coverage. Out of 7 links, most of them refer to the same website 13Joker13 (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is probably not going to make a difference to this discussion but FYI, nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Not sure what this user has against me, but he has tried to get other articles of mine deleted under different accounts. - Imcdc Contact 10:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or mention in another article Agreed, fails WP:GNG, other than the sources already in the article (which are mostly the same site), I haven't found anything other than passing mentions. Could probably have a section in another article, but doesn't need its own. Endersslay (talk) 16:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.