Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthias Mende
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Matthias Mende[edit]
- Matthias Mende (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person. At best there might be enough for an article about his app. Strongjam (talk) 14:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability (people). And neither does his app, if the sourcing in the article is all that there is to go on. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The way the article is reinstated verbatim within a few minutes is pretty suspicious. It seems as this user Lord Subro has been managing information elsewhere on the Internet, as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.204.192.38 (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC) formated by --Ben Ben (talk) 13:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete This reads promotional only. Proofed with a load of WP:QUESTIONABLE sources. The source from youtube, that is in german, not even mentions him.[1] --Ben Ben (talk) 14:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.