Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthias Geerts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matthias Geerts[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing much in the way of significant coverage in major, independent, reliable sources. The article's main statement of significance is that he has lots of followers on Instagram (which isn't a valid claim to notability) and his business which seemingly received passing publicity upon its launch with no lasting effect. SITH (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search turned up plenty of chit-chat on social sites, but no independent substantial coverage (the interview in de Bijenkorf is not WP:RS for notability purposes). Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 14:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.