Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Young

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and protected aganist re-creation. Mailer Diablo 06:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Young[edit]

Bad vanity article. Apparenty this guy's a teenager, so it looks a bit like BS too. -R. fiend 09:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can not see that it fits with Wikipedia:Notability (people) --Royal Blue 11:03, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's hard to tell whether or not it's nonsense. However, delete him for being non-notable. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 11:24, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, bottom line: he writes a political commentary blog with a handful of entries. Not sure where he establishes notability. Kuru ^talk 17:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable and due to verifiability problems. Capitalistroadster 17:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin: assuming this is to be deleted (and it is looking as of now like it will be) it should be noted a page under this title has been created and deleted several times. This may justify a "deletedpage" protection, although two things should be kept in mind: the earlier versions seem to be about a different Matthew Young, so it's probably just a coincidence that it's been deleted before, and there was apparently a Bishop of Clonfert named Matthew Young, who I suppose would meet notability requirements. Though I'd be very surprised if articles will be created for many of the Bishops of Clonfert, so a protected deletion would not be likely to get in the way of anything. So page protection might want to be considered. -R. fiend 19:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unverifiable, possibly nonsense. I'd expect that such an accomplished teenager would have news profiles. —ERcheck @ 20:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pretty sure this was made up in school one day. -- Krash (Talk) 14:54, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.