Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Goodgame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Goodgame[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some coverage, but doesn't seem to meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Has had some roles in the West End, but unclear the roles are significant enough for notability. Boleyn (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Lots of passing mentions in reliable sources but nothing very significant. Not seeing RS publishing interviews, profiles or the like. He won a talent show but that doesn't even seem to have an article so that's not a big help. Not much of the content is referenced. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the roles are certainly significant such as Danny Zucko in Grease in the West End, Billy Flynn in Chicago in the West End, lead roles in Cats, Thornbirds the Musical and others. Will look for more sources tomorrow, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and speedy close. Extremely simple to turn up sufficient sourcing; just GSearch on Goodgame and the name of productions he has appeared in. Sloth and indolence are not among Wikipedia's five pillars. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 00:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
update, couldn't find too much except here, here,here, here, here (needs a subscription), and here, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this AfD has turned up sources to show notability. Atlantic306 has done some research. Passes WP:NACTOR and WP:CREATIVE#3 Grease Wm335td (talk) 19:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am relisting for a week so that Atlantic306 can present the sources mentioned earlier, in the hope it helps consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources posted above are sufficient to pass WP:ENT or WP:GNG. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.