Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Faber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Faber[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACTOR with a small filmography of minor or one-time roles, and the lack of article content reflects such since its creation. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 05:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I think the subject passes WP:NACTOR, with either main or supporting roles in a number of notable films, like Palindromes (film). The subject is currently getting media attention due to his unfortunate premature death, but I would expect there to be more sources out there too. I'll try to find more. As it is, I don't think deletion is necessary. Dflaw4 (talk) 01:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 06:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - WP:NACTOR passed quite easily. there's a reason his recent passing got so much attention. he's notable.Grmike (talk) 14:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)grmike[reply]
Keep Meets NACTOR. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 16:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.