Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Clarke (actor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JodyB talk 05:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Clarke (actor)[edit]

Matthew Clarke (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG not satisfied. Not a notable actor. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Next_of_Kin_(TV_series)#Characters - Minor actor with his Next of Kin being his best known work in addition to his recent work as a "location manager" which would hardly receive much significant attention. Everything is supported by IMDb with no other links or information to add to the article. I should mention that detailed searches including Google News provided nothing. SwisterTwister talk 21:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 05:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete -- a redirect of an actor to his character is not appropriate, unless the article is substantially expanded to tell us what he was doing before and after. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 23:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.