Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Wilkins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. @pple (☞ talk) 23:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Wilkins[edit]

Matt Wilkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman, according to Wikipedia:Notability (people). Notability is only asserted for his work at the airport per WP:BLP1E, and this is mostly covered in Old Buckenham Airport. In the references where his name is mentioned, it's a passing mention or brief quote, which doesn't fulfill the requirement for substantial coverage from secondary sources. Ruby Murray 18:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Ruby Murray 18:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Ruby Murray 18:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Looks NN to me. The fact that his airport has been de facto foreclosed seems to say it all. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 13:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete on the basis of not meeting GNG - coverage in sources is not significant. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.