Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Prosser
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Coredesat 07:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Matt Prosser[edit]
Player has not played in a fully professional league GauchoDude (talk) 09:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This player has not played in a fully professional league ... semi-professional does not count as stated in WP:BIO. When said player appears for a fully professional team, then he would be worthy of an article. GauchoDude (talk) 09:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the reasoning presented by the nominator holds truth. Punkmorten (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for reason above. (GowsiPowsi (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable per WP:BIO. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. пﮟოьεԻ 57 18:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO. Even the article asserts his own NN. Peanut4 (talk) 18:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Eddie6705 (talk) 19:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.