Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt McNamara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 14:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matt McNamara[edit]

Matt McNamara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no sources, and a quick Google search gives little sources to show notability. Spinixster (chat!) 11:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I also couldn't locate any sources for this guy, and given the article already lacks sources, it doesn't seem to meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk) 18:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.