Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt "Skitz" Sanders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Matt "Skitz" Sanders[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not individually notable. No sourcing on him proper. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At bare minimum, Sanders meets WP:MUSIC bullet 6, and existing sources verify both his eligibility as a member of two or more groups and his prominence in the scene (perhaps also meeting bullet 7). Chubbles (talk) 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As I dePRODed this article, I'm working on its refs and content. It was poorly referenced and structured but the subject is notable per WP:MUSIC.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Shaidar cuebiyar's comments - concur that subject is notable.Dan arndt (talk) 14:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.