Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrudevobhava

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matrudevobhava[edit]

Film with no claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. Gsearch and gnews aren't turning up notability, however language issues may be hindering my search, so bringing to AfD instead of prod. Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Found notability under the correct spelling... "Mathru Devo Bhava" (darn translations): Google search. I will take a crack at bringing the article into line. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding this. Glad to withdraw the nom as long as the copyvio issues with this site are taken care of. Should the article get moved to the correct spelling?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know yet how to myself do such a move, but would certainly agree that it should be moved to the "most common" English language spelling and have an (aka) added to the lead-in. I have discovered that many times in translation of Hindi, Telugu, etc. names to English, there are spaces between words that are eliminated or added, and letters that are eliminate, added, or substituted. For instance, in recent work on a film called "Vamsi", I found it online also called "Vamsee", "Vamshi" and "Vamshee". This makes searches a bit tougher.. but when comparing cast and crew one can usually find the correct spellings. This same holds true for names of the individuals involved. Quite a headache, but can usually be dealt with on a one-by-one basis. I'll be glad to deal with the author's copy-vio problems. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Have done a major trimming to remove copyvio, and a rewrite to remove peacock. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! I've replied on my talk page with instructions on how to move a page.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in light of improvements done by MichaelQSchmidt. Hope you would perform the necessary move once this AfD is over. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 19:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank all. Figured out how to "move". Fun and easy! Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It now looks better and neater with the move and rewrite. SchfiftyThree ^(talk!) 15:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.