Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matriculation fetishism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was unanimous delete. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 08:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matriculation fetishism[edit]

Neologism. Google hits? Zilch. Ifnord 18:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --W.marsh 18:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Aaron 18:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unverifiable neologism. Not worth merging into fetishism (like I had to say that). --Kinu 18:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy BJAODN. Daniel Case 20:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Proceed directly to BJAODN. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 21:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's been done. Daniel Case 22:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No Google matches, and sounds rather implausible. -- Mithent 22:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: At least it's a funny hoax. The really funny thing is, I'm sure it's true of someone, somewhere. I just hope it never becomes notable, or I'm ending my education. Adrian Lamo ·· 23:53, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as stupid but on the plus side, it made me laugh for a full minute. Bobby1011 19:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one of the better hoaxes Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:31, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.