Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matilda and the Ramsay Bunch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. Of note is that the article creator was soft-blocked (by another admin) per their username being a username violation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matilda and the Ramsay Bunch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is created by editor with username matching article title. Joel.Miles925 (talk) 22:24, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I'm fairly sure having a username that is the same as an article isn't a reason for deletion. As for sourcing, check out: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Has been featured on other sites: [6]. Passes WP:GNG. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.