Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Math Is Fun (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Math Is Fun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a webpage that fails the general notability guideline as well as the specific notability guideline for webpages as it hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources, nor has it won any significant awards. This was kept at AfD in 2006, yet our interpretation of WP:WEB has changed over the years and this website no longer meets it. Them From Space 08:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject does not appear to be notable and article contains numerous style issues. Tyrol5 [Talk] 17:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is actually a popular site (which I maintain). Even though you may not see it much in your wanderings, it is much used by schools and students. For example compete.com ranks it 3,005 (http://siteanalytics.compete.com/mathsisfun.com/). It is a "bread and butter" site that does not get or need press coverage or sensational headlines, so is unlikely to be noticed, unless you are needing to complete your homework! MathsIsFun (talk) 04:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear to pass WP:WEB. Alexa rank 638,408. Also appears to have COI/Spam issues as well. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It definitely does not pass WP:WEB criteria. It might be a great website that used by lots of students but it's not notable. Furthermore, the article seems to just be an outline of the website and does not say why it is culturally or historically important or what it has achieved. Hippychick 02:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hippychickali (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.