Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maternal (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maternal (film)[edit]

Maternal (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF; article was created WP:TOOSOON; must be deleted or draftified until further notice. The Film Creator (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Canada. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:15, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, obviously without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when the film actually sees release. It's not our role to indiscriminately maintain an article about every single film that merely enters the production pipeline — with rare exceptions for highly meganotable films (e.g. Marvel, Star Wars) that generate a lot of coverage during the production phase, we normally don't want an article at all until the film is released and starting to get reviewed by real film critics. The existence of a couple of casting announcements is not enough coverage to exempt a film from having to clear the primary notability bar for films, especially when those are dated late 2019 or early 2020 — something has gone very wrong, in a way that definitely violates our inclusion criteria for films, if a film whose sources were all published two full years ago still hasn't actually seen light of day. Bearcat (talk) 17:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.