Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matías Escudero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clearly meets subject specific guideline on multiple accounts. Nomination rationale is fundamentally flawed. Fenix down (talk) 08:11, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matías Escudero[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG and neither of them exist in this page in order to pass the above criteria. NextGenSam619^t@lk 09:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. NextGenSam619^t@lk 10:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. NextGenSam619^t@lk 10:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NextGenSam619^t@lk 10:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NextGenSam619^t@lk 10:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Subject does in fact pass WP:NFOOTY, the football-specific notability guideline, by having played in a fully professional league as listed at WP:FPL. In fact, three fully professional leagues. He is currently playing for the reigning Primera División de Chile champions, and contributed with 13 games as they won that title. Before that, he played 147 times for Nueva Chicago in the Primera B Nacional and the Primera B Metropolitana in Argentina, both of which are listed as fully professional. This information is verified in the Soccerway and BDFA external links already present in the article. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Struway2. Giant Snowman 12:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Struway2. The article definitely needs improvement, not deletion. Please remember WP:BEFORE. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 15:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Struway2 passes WP:FOOTY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:NFOOTY. Nfitz (talk) 19:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.