Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masuma Hasan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Greenbörg (talk) 11:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Masuma Hasan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real notability. Fails WP:GNG. Being an ambassador is not enough to be notable. See this essay WP:DIPLOMAT. Greenbörg (talk) 07:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as she appears to have held several notable posts internationally, which qualify for WP:GNG and WP:DIPLOMAT. Mar4d (talk) 14:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has held many senior posts, including the first female at federal secretary rank in Pakistan. Easily notable enough for an article. I'm puzzled as to why the nominator focused on her few years as an ambassador to the exclusion of all her other posts. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep she's held several major posts and had several "firsts" in Pakistan. I've added some sources and think there may be a lot in Urdu. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.