Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masters of Pain
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Masters of Pain[edit]
- Masters of Pain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Tournament in a company that was deleted for not meeting WP:CORP (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IWA East Coast). Nikki♥311 05:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki♥311 05:29, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If so many of the participants are notable and have their own articles, doesn't that suggest that this event involving them is also notable? Can it at least be merged to a broader wrestling group to which it is affiliated? PicodeGato (talk) 01:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It cannot be merged because the company itself has already been deleted for not being notable. Nikki♥311 05:52, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Can it be mentioned in Independent circuit? PicodeGato (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too much listing and no information worth having about a competition(?) (I have personal doubts about the current wrestling world) run by a company not regarded as notable. At a quick glance (not too far, as I don't want to spoil my tea...) the blue linked people seem to be notable for other things than this. Peridon (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.