Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MasterChef Croatia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. joe deckertalk to me 16:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
MasterChef Croatia[edit]
- MasterChef Croatia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable? Only reference is their own website. Hello71 (talk) 22:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings ! MasterChef Croatia is a new show on a Croatian famous television Nova TV. Show started on January 21.
I just want to tell you that this article describes the show details, like other MasterChef articles.
Big kiss, MessyLittleRaindrops (talk) 12:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.3.225.223 (talk) [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Sure, the only source used is the official website but this is often the case with articles about reality shows. From what I've seen the established criteria for reality shows is vague at best and I don't see why MasterChef Croatia should be the one to go, considering the fact that we've got MasterChef Malaysia, MasterChef New Zealand, MasterChef Greece, MasterChef Indonesia, MasterChef Sweden and MasterChef Australia. I know that what I'm saying reeks of WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:NOHARM but still. Reality shows seem to defy logic around here :-) Timbouctou (talk) 16:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I feel I should note to Timbouctou that in my opinion WP:OTHERSTUFF cautions against irrelevant comparisons (we should keep this article on a minor pokemon character because we have this one on a small town in this small country). Direct comparisons (we have articles on this same series in 5 other countries, they should be kept as a set) are valid. HominidMachinae (talk) 08:37, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No reason why this should go if the direct equivalents (other MasterChef articles) are staying. To be scrupulously fair, either they all stay, or they all go. Pesky (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Now the article is backed up by non-primary sources, there is a reasonable case for standalone notability. "All or nothing" argument in favor of keeping it would not be valid, as individual articles still have to meet WP:GNG at the very least, and it's quite possible that some do and some don't. GregorB (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.