Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Vale Cotton (4th nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. plicit 07:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mason Vale Cotton[edit]

Mason Vale Cotton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mason Vale Cotton

Actor who has already been found not to satisfy acting notability twice. The most recent deletion discussion was in August 2020 and was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Vale Cotton (3rd nomination). No roles are described that are more recent than 2020. Neither the Desperate Housewives role or the Mad Men role are lead roles. Nothing has changed in the past two years. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete same as last time, non-GNG, minor roles. Oaktree b (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Satifies WP:NACTOR easily. His two series credits were co-starring roles, one nominated for a SAG award as part of an ensemble cast, for which bit players and extras aren't eligible. Some of the refs below confirm starring or co-starring status in both network series. A supporting leading role is the equivalent of a co-starring role. NACTOR only requires "significant roles" in multiple projects.
The article requires flagging with a citations needed banner, not deletion. IMDb says he has two upcoming projects, so he hasn't left the business. 5Q5| 12:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep They don't seem to be bit parts, I think ACTOR is satisfied. They aren't the starring roles, but prominent enough. Oaktree b (talk) 13:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oaktree b, you already voted "Delete", what is your true view of the status of this article? Liz Read! Talk! 04:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, I'd not stricken my vote above. Reconsidered after reviewing the information. Oaktree b (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.