Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masaaki Fujimori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Masaaki Fujimori[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FILMMAKER. Only minor credits on IMDb, and sole film has been in production since 2007 (I have also nominated it for deletion). No RS on this person and activities as filmmaker or maker of commercials or music videos. Michitaro (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

his nom de plume: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Being director and producer of "over 100 music videos and commercials in the United States" is notable ONLY if such has received significant coverage in reliable sources... and so unless this was under some other name, it is not notable. Being a "tombstone designer" has no inherant notability, unless doing so receives significant coverage in reliable sources. Being a "sports journalist " carries no inherant notability unles doing so is covered in reliable sources. Being a "filmmaker" carries no inherant notability unles being so is covered in multiple reliable sources. With the lack of any source speaking about individual in ANY fashion, we have a WP:BLP that suffers from a lack of verifiability. If Japanese-language reliable souces are brought forward, I can reconsider. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.