Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Swick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:33, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Swick[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about an author, or a book that she wrote. I PROD'd the article back on April 4, and there are templates on the article indicating issues with notability and such; these were removed at one point, but the tags were restored. In any case, the subject of the article seems to lack any real notability as per our standards. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of meeting WP:AUTHOR. Book publisher's own site says they "help authors self-publish books".[1] AllyD (talk) 08:34, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Self published. The two 'references' are the book author's site and what appears to be her parent's site carrying a plug for the book. In my usual trawl of ten pages of ghits, I found nothing I'd consider a reliable independent source. (I eliminated Justin Bieber's tattoo from the search.) Peridon (talk) 13:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 16:53, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – the subject lacks independent sources Senator2029 (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.