Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Rahman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 05:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Rahman[edit]

Mary Rahman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMO article for a PR executive. No assertion of notability on page, just a basic CV. Sources provided are low quality and at best trivial mentions. My searches turn up nothing better. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG and WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as still nothing suggesting the necessary notability and improvements. SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 15:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Subject lacks independent coverage in reliable sources and notability. Meatsgains (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.