Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvet Britto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Biblioworm 17:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marvet Britto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I simply see nothing to suggest better notability and improvement with my best search results this, this, this and here. Pinging past users Dialectric and MER-C. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - I was on the fence about this one. She gets a bunch of hits, but all of the trivial nature, and gets quoted a lot, but that is because she is a PR spokesman. This might pass WP:BASIC, but it doesn't pass WP:GNG. Taking into account the promotional aspect of the article pushed me into the delete category. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - per Onel5969 —UY Scuti ^Talk 13:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.