Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martins Corner, Nottoway County, Virginia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 13:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Martins Corner, Nottoway County, Virginia[edit]

Martins Corner, Nottoway County, Virginia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Y'all probably know the drill by this point: "corners" in Virginia that are PROD-ineligible because of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Shop Corner, Virginia, a procedurally closed bundled nom. These two had no individual discussion at that AFD. Topographic maps and WP:BEFORE strongly suggests that these were just road junctions named for the people that lived there, not legally recognized communities; WP:GEOLAND does not seem to be met. Hog Farm Talk 04:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 04:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Talk 04:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clays Corner, Virginia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Speedy delete all The previous misguided closure kept unverifiable and non-notable articles lacking either significant coverage or establishment that these were actual communities beyond a few neighbors, if at all. Reywas92Talk 05:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete All - Keeping the bundled results was wrong in the first place. Please refer to this vote as a standing vote to delete against ALL of these "corners" in any future AFD involving them. The failure of various people to allow a bulk solution to GNIS stubs has created a massive back-log of individual cases clogging up AFD and PROD processes that should have been foreseen. FOARP (talk) 15:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I recommend to delete all similar articles without reliable citation. Google map shows it is a cross section only. Why all editors have to go AFD for these 1 line articles without any notable reference.Shahram 19:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.