Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Wave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Wave[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this musician is notable. There is a trivial mention at "Billboard" magazine, but it doesn't support notability. Current references also don't support notability. Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Seagull123: I saw that you proposed this page for the deletion earlier in May 2020. Do you want to comment here? --Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbarmadillo: thanks for pinging me. I nominated it for deletion in May for WP:BLPPROD, as there weren't any references at all at that time. Looking at it now, I'm leaning towards delete, as most of the sources in the article (and the ones I can find on Google) appear to either be passing mentions, or just webpages listing information about the person, neither of which convince me of this person's notability. Seagull123 Φ 12:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep found a source. –Cupper52^Discuss! 17:44, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Cupper52: can I ask if you mean this source? Seagull123 Φ 12:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.